Nichols v. Schwarz, 504 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). · Go Syfert
Nichols v. Schwarz, 504 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Reyf v. Reyf (fladistctapp, 1993-06-08)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Reyf v. Reyf
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1993 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Nichols v. Schwarz, 504 So.2d 503 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (continuing writ of garnishment authorized by § 61.12(2) only for collection of future periodic payments of alimony or child support).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rose Marie Schwarz NICHOLS
v.
Elton H. SCHWARZ
No. 4-86-0946.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 25, 1987.
504 So. 2d 503
1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7356
Richard A. Kupfer of Cone, Wagner, Nu-gent, Johnson, Roth & Romano, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant., Richard A. Gescheidt of Gescheidt and Foreman, Boca Raton, for appellee.
Anstead, Dell, Hersey.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s holding that a continuing writ of garnishment is not available under section 61.12(2), Florida Statutes (Supp.1984), for collecting a judgment for arrearages of child support, but is limited in application to ensuring the collectibility of future periodic payments of alimony or child support. See, e.g., Goldstein v. Ginsberg, 399 So.2d 415 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (where husband’s duty to make periodic payments had ended, continuing writ of garnishment was not available).

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., concur.