Freeland v. Freeland, 534 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Freeland v. Freeland, 534 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John Rice FREELAND
v.
Violet Joyce FREELAND
No. 87-1172.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec 7, 1988.
534 So. 2d 890
J. Bruce Bickner of Dawson, Galant, Su-lik, Wiesenfeld & Bickner, Jacksonville, for appellant., John-W. Pafford of Penland, Penland & Pafford, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellee.
Joanos, Nimmons, Wigginton.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We affirm. The required payment of the second mortgage should be affirmed as either equitable distribution or alimony. We remand to the trial court for clarification as to which of the above classifications was intended. See Zediker v. Zediker, 398 So.2d 915 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

JOANOS, WIGGINTON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.