Trombley v. State, 541 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Trombley v. State, 541 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Richard L. TROMBLEY
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 88-0662.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Apr 26, 1989.
541 So. 2d 798
1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2236
1989 WL 39572
Harry Gulkin of Harry Gulkin, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Alfonso M. Saldana, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Anstead, Garrett, Letts.
Published
PER CURIAM.

As to the admissibility of the tape recordings, we affirm upon the authority of Odum v. State, 403 So.2d 936 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 925, 102 S.Ct.1970, 72 L.Ed.2d 440 (1982), Tumulty v. State, 489 So.2d 150 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), and section 934.03(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1985).

As to the admissibility of the “battered woman syndrome” evidence, we affirm upon the authority of Kruse v. State, 483 So.2d 1383 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), rev. dismissed, 507 So.2d 588 (Fla.1987), Terry v. State, 467 So.2d 761, 764 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), rev. denied, 476 So.2d 675 (Fla.1985), and State v. Ciskie, 110 Wash.2d 263, 268, 751 P.2d 1165, 1170 (1988).

As to the imposition of consecutive sentences, we affirm upon the authority of Murray v. State, 491 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1986).

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GARRETT, JJ., concur.