Ellen Fjellestad v. Pizza Hut of Am., Inc., 182 F.3d 609 (8th Cir. 1999). · Go Syfert
Ellen Fjellestad v. Pizza Hut of Am., Inc., 182 F.3d 609 (8th Cir. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Loeckle v. State Farm Automobile Insurance (iand, 1999-07-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Loeckle v. State Farm Automobile Insurance (2×) also: Cited as authority (rule)
N.D. Iowa · 1999 · signal: accord · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence bake:cell
the following factors are considered in determining whether a person is substantially limited in a major life activity: (1) the nature and severity of the impairment; (2) its duration or anticipated duration; and (3) its long-term impact.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Paula Angles v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
4th Cir. · 2012 · confidence medium
Murray v. Archambo, 182 F.3d 609, 612 (10th Cir.1998) (noting “an amendment that has been filed or served without leave of court ... is without legal effect”).
cited Cited "see" Peter Cannice,appellee/cross-Appellant v. Norwest Bank Iowa N.A. And Norwest Bank Iowa N.A. Card Services Division, Appellants/cross-Appellees
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fjellestad v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc., 182 F.3d 609, 616-619 (8th Cir.1999).
cited Cited "see" Peter Cannice v. Norwest Bank N.A.
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fjellestad v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc., No. 98-2071, 1999 WL 391911 , at *5-*7 (8th -4- Cir. June 16, 1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ellen Fjellestad
v.
Pizza Hut of America, Inc.
98-2071.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Jun 16, 1999.
182 F.3d 609
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13269
1999 WL 391911
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

182 F.3d 609 (8th Cir. 1999)

Ellen Fjellestad, Appellant,
v.
Pizza Hut of America, Inc., Appellee.

No. 98-2071

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

Submitted: February 12, 1999
Filed: June 16, 1999

1

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION. SEE SUBSTITUTED OPINION AT 188 F.3d 944.