green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Pert v. United States (In Re Pert)
See Griffith v. United States of America (In re Griffith), 182 F.3d 1297 (11th Cir.1999). 21 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: Leroy Charles Griffith, Debtor. Leroy Charles Griffith v. United States
(2×)
See In re Griffith, 161 B.R. 727, 730 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1993), aff'd, 210 B.R. 216 (S.D.Fla.1997), rev’d, 174 F.3d 1222 (11th Cir.), vacated and reh’g en banc granted, 182 F.3d 1297 (11th Cir.1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Griffith v. United States
See In re Griffith, 210 B.R. 216, 220 (S.D. 5 Fla. 1997 ), rev'd, 174 F.3d 1222 (11th Cir.), vacated and reh'g en banc granted, 182 F.3d 1297 (11th Cir. 1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Griffith v. United States
(2×)
See In re Griffith, 161 B.R. 727, 730 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1993), aff'd, 210 B.R. 216 (S.D.Fla.1997), rev'd, 174 F.3d 1222 (11th Cir.), vacated and reh'g en banc granted, 182 F.3d 1297 (11th Cir.1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In RE: Leroy Charles GRIFFITH, Debtor. Leroy Charles Griffith, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
United States of America, Defendant-Appellee
v.
United States of America, Defendant-Appellee
97-4845.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Aug 6, 1999.
182 F.3d 1297
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18403
1999 WL 594949
Robert L. Roth, Attorney at Law, Coral Gables, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant., Laurie Snyder, Tax Division, Department of Justice, Bruce R. Ellisen, Dept, of Justice, Appellate Tax Division, John A. Dudeck, Jr., Department of Justice, Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Défen-dant-Appellee., William A. Keefer, Miami, FL,-for Defendant-Appellee.
Anderson, Tjoflat, Edmondson, Cox, Birch, Dubina, Black, Carnes, Barkett, Hull, Marcus.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.