Newman v. State, 566 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Newman v. State, 566 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Philip NEWMAN
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 89-2508.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Sep 12, 1990.
566 So. 2d 372
1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6791
1990 WL 129682
Arthur P. Cohen, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Miles Ferris, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Hersey, Polen, Stone.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We hold that appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief as originally filed adequately specifies the facts supporting the motion, as Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 requires. We reverse the trial court’s order denying the amended motion, and remand for consideration of the motion on its merits.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.