United States v. Jose Lombera-Camorlinga, United States of Am. v. Jose Oropeza-Flores, 188 F.3d 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Jose Lombera-Camorlinga, United States of Am. v. Jose Oropeza-Flores, 188 F.3d 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rocha v. State (texcrimapp, 2000-04-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Rocha v. State (2×)
Tex. Crim. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Reyes, 740 A.2d at 12-13 (relying upon Ninth Circuit panel opinion United States v. Camorlinga, 170 F.3d 1241, 1242-43 (9th Cir.), withdrawn, 188 F.3d 1177 (9th Cir. 1999)); Lombera-Camorlinga, 206 F.3d 882, 883-84 (2000)(overturning panel opinion due to contrary conclusion).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ore-Irawa
E.D. Mich. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga, 188 F.3d 1177, 1177-8 (9th Cir.1999). 2 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Carrillo (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
N.D. Ill. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga, 188 F.3d 1177 , 1999 WL 787431, at *1 (9th Cir. Oct.1, 1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Jose Lombera-Camorlinga, United States of America v. Jose Oropeza-Flores
98-50347.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Oct 1, 1999.
188 F.3d 1177
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 82%
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)

188 F.3d 1177 (9th Cir. 1999)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JOSE LOMBERA-CAMORLINGA, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JOSE OROPEZA-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 98-50347, 98-50305

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Filed October 1, 1999

Before: HUG, Chief Judge.

1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three judge panel opinion, United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga, 170F.3d 1241 (9th Cir.1999), and the three judge memorandum decision, United States v. Oropeza-Flores, No. 98-50305, 1999 WL 195621 (9th Cir. Mar. 31, 1999), are withdrawn.