United States v. German Espinoza Montero-Camargo, United States of Am. v. Lorenzo Sanchez-Guillen, 192 F.3d 946 (9th Cir. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. German Espinoza Montero-Camargo, United States of Am. v. Lorenzo Sanchez-Guillen, 192 F.3d 946 (9th Cir. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
45 citation events (44 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Alfred Velazquez, 125 F.4th 1290 (9th Cir. 2025)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 951 Evidence is unfairly prejudicial if “it provokes an emotional response in the jury or otherwise tends to affect adversely the jury’s attitude toward the defendant wholly apart from its judgment.4 citing cases1 citing court put it this way
  • Dailey v. Hecht, No. 17-1409 (10th Cir. Dec. 7, 2018).
    (Evidence is unfairly prejudicial if “it provokes an emotional response in the jury or otherwise tends to affect adversely the jury’s attitude toward the defendant wholly apart from its judgment.)
  • United States v. Tan, 254 F.3d 1204 (10th Cir. 2001). 2 cites
    (quotation omitted)
  • United States v. Goxcon-Chagal, 885 F. Supp. 2d 1118 (D.N.M. 2012).
    See United States v. Rodriguez, 192 F.3d at 951.
  • United States v. Goxcon-Chagal, 886 F. Supp. 2d 1222 (D.N.M. 2012).
    See United States v. Rodriguez, 192 F.3d at 951.
At page 947 cited at this page1 citing case
Other citing cases5 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
German Espinoza Montero-Camargo, United States of America v. Lorenzo Sanchez-Guillen
97-50643.
Docket on CourtListener (RECAP)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Oct 25, 1999.
192 F.3d 946
99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8544
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 26912
Published

192 F.3d 946 (9th Cir. 1999)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
GERMAN ESPINOZA MONTERO-CAMARGO, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
LORENZO SANCHEZ-GUILLEN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 97-50643, No. 97-50645

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

October 25, 1999

D.C. No. CR 96-02233-1-IEG, D.C. No. CR 96-02233-2-IEG

Before: HUG, Chief Judge.

Order

1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, United States v. Montero-Camargo, 177 F.3d 1113 (9th Cir. 1999), is withdrawn.