Shuh v. State, 598 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Shuh v. State, 598 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Dwight SHUH
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 91-1872.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jun 3, 1992.
Published opinion
598 So. 2d 334
1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5829
1992 WL 115765
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Debra Moses Stephens, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Gunther, Letts, Stone.
Published

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse appellant’s sentence and remand for resentencing and a rehearing on the suitability of imposing an adult sentence on the appellant. The trial court erred by failing to reduce to writing its decision to impose adult sanctions. E.g., Ford v. State, 576 So.2d 440 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); § 39.111(7)(d), Fla.Stat. (1989). Because they are now moot, we do not address the issues raised on appeal concerning the adequacy of the trial court’s oral findings.

LETTS and GUNTHER, JJ., concur. STONE, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Concurrence

STONE, Judge,

concurring specially.

I concur in the opinion and add a suggestion that on remand, the trial court address subsection (6) of the statute more specifically. In my judgment, findings based solely on the trial court’s unsubstantiated personal opinion concerning the inadequacy of H.R.S. juvenile services in the county is a patently insufficient ground for determining an individual defendant’s prospects for rehabilitation.