green
Positive treatment
10.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Richard Berger
In support, the government cites United States v. Romero-Rendon, 198 F.3d 745, 748 (9th Cir. 1999),13 withdrawn by 220 F.3d 1159, 1165 (9th Cir. 2000)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Berger
In support, the government cites United States v. Romero-Rendon, 198 F.3d 745, 748 (9th Cir.1999), 13 withdrawn by 220 F.3d 1159, 1165 (9th Cir.2000).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Richard Dehart Charlesworth
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Moreover, where, as here, “the defendant does not challenge the accuracy of the information on which the judge bases the sentence enhancement, the preponderance of the evidence standard is the appropriate one regardless of the severity of the enhancement.” United States v. Romero-Rendon, 198 F.3d 745, 748 (9th Cir.1999) (footnote omitted).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dickerson
See United States v. Charlesworth, 217 F.3d 1155, 1160-61 (9th Cir.2000) (rejecting the contention that the district court’s reliance on undisputed hearsay statements was improper); see also United States v. Romero-Rendon, 198 F.3d 745, 750 (9th Cir. 1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Victor Romero-Rendon, AKA Pedro MacIas
v.
Victor Romero-Rendon, AKA Pedro MacIas
99-50137.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Dec 7, 1999.
198 F.3d 745
99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9597
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 32000
Published
198 F.3d 745 (9th Cir. 1999)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
VICTOR ROMERO-RENDON, aka Pedro Macias, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 99-50137
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Argued and Submitted September 30, 1999,
Filed December 7, 1999,
1
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION. SEE OPINION AT 220 F.3d 1159.