United States v. Robert W. Kubick, United States of Am. v. William D. Herron, United States of Am. v. Robert W. Kubick, William D. Herron, 199 F.3d 1051 (9th Cir. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Robert W. Kubick, United States of Am. v. William D. Herron, United States of Am. v. Robert W. Kubick, William D. Herron, 199 F.3d 1051 (9th Cir. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Behn v. Barnhart (cacd, 2006-10-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Behn v. Barnhart
C.D. Cal. · 2006 · confidence medium
Here, the ALJ’s legal error can be corrected with further proceedings; therefore, remand is the appropriate remedy. 4 Gutierrez, 199 F.3d at 1051; Moore, 405 F.3d at 1214 .
cited Cited as authority (rule) Harker v. Troutman (In Re Troutman Enterprises, Inc.)
Bankr. S.D. Ohio · 2000 · confidence medium
Not to do so violates the heart of the process.” United States v. Kubick, 199 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Robert W. Kubick, United States of America v. William D. Herron, United States of America v. Robert W. Kubick, William D. Herron
98-30082.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Dec 10, 1999.
199 F.3d 1051
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

199 F.3d 1051 (9th Cir. 1999)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ROBERT W. KUBICK, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM D. HERRON, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ROBERT W. KUBICK, WILLIAM D. HERRON, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 98-30082, No. 98-30083, No. 98-30097

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

November 1, 1999, Argued and Submitted
December 10, 1999, Filed

1

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION. SEE OPINION AT 205 F.3d 1117.