green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Cunningham v. State
See Chaison v. State, 608 So.2d 560 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), rev. denied, 617 So.2d 318 (Fla.1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Baker v. State
See Seabrook v. State, 608 So.2d 560 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), approved 629 So.2d 129 (Fla.1993); Porter v. State, 609 So.2d 640 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), approved, 629 So.2d 834 (Fla.1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marblee SEABROOK
v.
STATE of Florida
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 91-939.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 18, 1992.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Carl S. McGinnes, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., James W. Rogers, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
Smith, Wigginton, Wolf.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was sentenced as an habitual felony offender. We affirm. However, as we did in Hodges v. State, 596 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), we certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:
DOES SECTION 775.084, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), DENY EITHER DUE PROCESS OR EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW UNDER EITHER THE FLORIDA OR THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION; OR VIOLATE THE DOCTRINE OF SEPARATION OF POWERS, AS SET FORTH IN THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?SMITH, WIGGINTON and WOLF, JJ., concur.