No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Francisco AQUINO
v.
STATE of Florida
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 95-2488.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug 30, 1995.
Francisco Aquino, Bowling Green, pro se., No appearance required for appellee.
Dell, Klein, Shahood.
Published
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion without prejudice to his filing a rule 3.850 motion in proper form. We do not have a sufficient record to determine whether, if appellant does file a rule 3.850 motion, it would be successive under rule 3.850(f), and this opinion should not be construed as deciding that issue.
DELL, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.