Mitchell v. State, 751 So. 2d 15 (Ala. 1999). · Go Syfert
Mitchell v. State, 751 So. 2d 15 (Ala. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Ex parte Best Choice Roofing Alabama, LLC PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (In re: Kalie Dixon and Michael Dixon v. Best Choice Roofing and Home Improvement, Inc.) (Washington Circuit Court: CV-24-900088). (ala, 2025-11-26)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Ex parte Best Choice Roofing Alabama, LLC PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (In re: Kalie Dixon and Michael Dixon v. Best Choice Roofing and Home Improvement, Inc.) (Washington Circuit Court: CV-24-900088).
Ala. · 2025 · confidence medium
We state these items not as requirements, but merely as factors that, considered together, should in a particular case give a clear indication whether the chosen forum is reasonable.' "Ex parte Northern Capital Resource Corp., 751 So. 2d at 15." The Dixons do not contend that the forum-selection clause would be unfair based on fraud, undue influence, or overweening bargaining power.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ex Parte Robert Guylon Mitchell. (Re: Robert Guylon Mitchell
v.
State.)
1981478.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
Nov 24, 1999.
751 So. 2d 15
Michael D. Blalock, Birmingham, for petitioner., No brief filed for respondent.
Brown, Hooper, Houston, See, England.
Published
BROWN, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT DENIED.

HOOPER, C.J., and HOUSTON, SEE, and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.