Hollimon v. State, 769 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Hollimon v. State, 769 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Cady v. IMC Mortgage Co. (ri, 2004-12-20)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Cady v. IMC Mortgage Co.
R.I. · 2004 · confidence medium
Venture Homes, Inc. v. Pratt, 769 So.2d 435, 436 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harry K. HOLLIMON
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 2D00-680.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Sep 20, 2000.
769 So. 2d 435
Casanueva, Salcines, Whatley.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Harry K. Hollimon appeals the summary denial of his motion for additional jail credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because the issue cannot be determined based upon the face of the court records but would require an evidentiary hearing to resolve, we affirm without prejudice to Hollimon filing a motion pursuant to rule 3.850. See, e.g., State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998) (holding that credit time issues can be raised pursuant to rule 3.800(a) only when the court records demonstrate an entitlement to relief on their face). By this opinion we make no comment on Holli-mon’s entitlement to the additional credit.

Affirmed.

WHATLEY, A.C.J., and CASANUEVA and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.