green
Positive treatment
11.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Dunbar v. State
Bush v. State, 945 So.2d 1207, 1210 (Fla. 2006); Wilson v. State, 9 So.3d 630 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (table); Reeves v. State, 987 So.2d 779, 780 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); Patterson v. State, 784 So.2d 451, 452 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (mem.).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
LaFerte-Diaz v. Department of Corrections
Bush, 945 So.2d at 1210 ; Reeves v. State, 987 So.2d 779, 780 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); Patterson v. State, 784 So.2d 451, 452 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (mem.).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barrington PATTERSON
v.
The STATE of Florida
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 3D98-2642.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Mar 22, 2000.
Barrington Patterson, in proper person., Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Goderich, Jorgenson, Ramirez.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM.
Barrington Patterson appeals from the trial court’s denial of his 3.800 motion. We affirm the denial of the motion finding that the issues raised lack merit. With regard[*452] to the issue of whether the Department of Corrections has properly credited Patterson with 392 days credit for time served in accordance with the trial court’s order, we note that the defendant must first exhaust the administrative remedies provided by the Department of Corrections. Bennett v. State, 732 So.2d 1130, 1131 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Accordingly, this affirmance is without prejudice to Patterson re-raising this issue once he has exhausted the administrative remedies provided by the Department of Corrections.
Affirmed.