Tunsil v. State, 831 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Tunsil v. State, 831 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2011 · …the trial court must evaluate the relevancy and materiality of the potential testimony that a listed witness may bring to the issues. at p. 260 ⚠ not in text
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Rabie Cortez v. Palace Holdings, S.A. De C.V. (fladistctapp, 2011-06-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Rabie Cortez v. Palace Holdings, S.A. De C.V. (2×)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2011 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence high
the trial court must evaluate the relevancy and materiality of the potential testimony that a listed witness may bring to the issues.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Douglas TUNSIL
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 3D02-635.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 27, 2002.
831 So. 2d 259
2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17560
2002 WL 31662912
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Lisa Walsh, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant., Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, and Thomas C. Mielke, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Goderich, Levy, Nesbitt.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Tunsil v. State, 797 So.2d 651 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).