Chong v. State, 891 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Chong v. State, 891 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Leonard CHONG
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 2D04-1858.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jan 28, 2005.
891 So. 2d 649
Lee Hollander of Law Offices of Hollander and Hanuka, Naples, for Appellant., Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and C. Suzanne Bechard, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Ap-pellee. ■
Canady, Stringer, Wallace.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Leonard Chong appeals the denial of his motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which was summarily denied in part and finally denied-after an evidentiary hearing. Chong . raises two claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, and we affirm the postconviction. court’s ruling on each claim.

In. his third appellate issue, Chong .argued that his counsel was ineffective for failing to move to withdraw Chong’s plea after he requested counsel to do so. This matter was -not pleaded or litigated below. This court will' not address the merits of this issue because it was raised for the first time on appeal.

Affirmed.

STRINGER, CANADY, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.