green
Positive treatment
10.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases ·
…to prevail on a due process challenge to deportation proceedings, lata must show error and substantial prejudice.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Chunguang Jin v. Eric Holder, Jr.
We ‘“must uphold the BIA’s finding unless the evidence compels a contrary result.’ ” Almaghzar v. Gonzales, 457 F.3d 915, 920 (9th Cir.2006) (quoting Monjaraz-Munoz v. INS, 327 F.3d 892, 895 (9th Cir.2003), opinion amended on denial of reh’g, 339 F.3d 1012 *680 (9th Cir.2003)); see 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(4)(B).
examined
Cited "see"
Israel Sanchez Rosales v. William Barr
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Lo, 341 F.3d at 939 n.6 (citing Monjaraz-Munoz v. I.N.S., 327 F.3d 892 , 898 n.3 (9th Cir.), opinion amended on denial of reh’g, 339 F.3d 1012 (9th Cir. 2003)).
examined
Cited "see"
Israel Sanchez Rosales v. William Barr
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Lo, 341 F.3d at 939 n.6 (citing Monjaraz-Munoz v. I.N.S., 327 F.3d 892 , 898 n.3 (9th Cir.), opinion amended on denial of reh’g, 339 F.3d 1012 (9th Cir. 2003)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Salazar-Manzano v. Gonzales
See Monjaraz-Munoz v. INS, 327 F.3d 892, 896-98 (9th Cir.), as amended on reh’g, 339 F.3d 1012 (9th Cir.2003); Celis-Castellano v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 888, 892 (9th Cir.2002) (“[T]he Board must accept the facts in an alien’s affidavit as true unless inherently unbelievable.”).
cited
Cited "see"
Haifa Saleh El Himri Musab El Himri v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
See Monjaraz-Munoz v. INS, 327 F.3d 892, 895 (9th Cir.2003), amended by 339 F.3d 1012 (9th Cir.2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fong Yang Lo, AKA Fong Yang Yu Bin Lo v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General
(2×)
See Monjaraz-Munoz, 339 F.3d 1012 , 2003 WL 21848160 , at *6. 6 Accordingly, we GRANT the petition for review, REVERSE the denial of the petitioners’ motions to reopen, and REMAND to the BIA for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 1 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eduardo Ramos-Martinez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
See Lo, 341 F.3d at 936-39 ; see also Monjaraz-Munoz v. INS, 327 F.3d 892, 896-97 (9th Cir.2003), as amended on reh’g, 339 F.3d 1012 (9th Cir.2003) (failure to appear based on negligent ad *878 vice of attorney’s agent constitutes an exceptional circumstance).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Juan MONJARAZ-MUNOZ, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
02-70227.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Aug 8, 2003.
339 F.3d 1012
2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7065
2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 16270
Karla L. Kraus, Law Offices of Karla L. Kraus, San Diego, CA, for the petitioner., Jennifer A. Parker and Cindy S. Ferrier, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for the respondent.
Hall, Thompson, Berzon.
Cited by 42 opinions | Published
ORDER
The opinion filed on April 28, 2003, and found at 327 F.3d 892, is hereby amended. The last paragraph, on page 398, is deleted and replaced with the following text:
The petition for review is GRANTED. We REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
With this amendment, Respondent’s petition for rehearing is DENIED.