Schalk v. State, 960 S.W.2d 452 (Ark. 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Schalk v. State, 960 S.W.2d 452 (Ark. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jerry SCHALK
v.
STATE of Arkansas
CR 98-227.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
Mar 19, 1998.
960 S.W.2d 452
1998 Ark. LEXIS 154
Teri Swicegood, for appellant., No response.
Published
Per Curiam.

Jerry Schalk, by his attorney, Teri Swicegood, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the transcript was tendered late due to an error on her part.

We find such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.