green
Positive treatment
published
12.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Cited for
At page 1042 cited at this page2 citing cases
- United States v. Larson, 495 F.3d 1094 (9th Cir. 2007).published As we explained in Schoneberg : Where a plea agreement allows for some benefit or detriment to flow to a witness as a result of his testimony, the defendant must be permitted to cross-examine the witness sufficiently to make clear to the j…
- United States v. Larson, No. 05-30076 (9th Cir. July 31, 2007).published As we explained in United States v. Schoneberg: The constitutional right to cross-examine is “[s]ubject always to the broad discretion of a trial judge to preclude repetitive and unduly harassing interrogation,” but that limitation cannot…
Other citing cases
- United States v. Lloyd Nickle, 816 F.3d 1230 (9th Cir. 2016).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kenneth J. HAUGEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Rochelle BROSSEAU; Puyallup Police Department; The City of Puyallup, Defendants-Appellees
v.
Rochelle BROSSEAU; Puyallup Police Department; The City of Puyallup, Defendants-Appellees
01-35954.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Feb 3, 2004.
Published opinion
396 F.3d 1036
Randy W. Loun, Esq., Loun & Tyner, Bremerton, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellant., Mary Ann McConaughy, Esq., Keating Bucklin & McCormack Inc. P.S., Seattle', WA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Reinhardt, Fletcher, Gould.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
ORDER
The judgment of this court, 351 F.3d 372 (9th Cir.2003), was reversed by the United States Supreme Court. We remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the Supreme Court. See Brosseau v. Haugen, — U.S. ——, 125 S.Ct. 596, 160 L.Ed.2d 583 (2004).