State v. Morales, 714 A.2d 677 (Conn. 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Morales, 714 A.2d 677 (Conn. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Spiegelmann (connappct, 2004-02-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Spiegelmann (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Morales, 45 Conn. App. 116, 127-28 , 694 A.2d 1356 (1997), appeals dismissed, 246 Conn. 249 , 714 A.2d 677 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. CLIFFORD P. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id.; see also State v. Morales, 45 Conn. App. 116, 125 , 694 A.2d 1356 (1997) (“[a] poor or flawed memory by [the victim] in making an accusation is not sufficient to supply evidence of falsity”), appeal dismissed, 246 Conn. 249 , 714 A.2d 677 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Ortiz (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Morales, 45 Conn. App. 116, 136 , 694 A.2d 1356 (1997), appeals dismissed, 246 Conn. 249 , 714 A.2d 677 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
JUAN MORALES
SC 15720.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Aug 11, 1998.
714 A.2d 677
1998 Conn. LEXIS 304
Pamela S. Nagy, assistant public defender, for the appellant-appellee (defendant)., James M. Ralls, assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, were James E. Thomas, state’s attorney, and John M. Massameno, senior assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee-appellant (state).
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal and cross appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.[1]

The appeal and the cross appeal are dismissed.

1

We granted the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court; State v. Morales, 45 Conn. App. 116, 694 A.2d 1356 (1997); limited to the following issues: (1) “Whether the Appellate Court correctly determined that the defendant’s confrontation rights were not violated when the trial court refused to allow the defendant to cross-examine D, the child complainant, as well as her mother, Dr. Frederick Barrien and Veronica Lugris, about her previous accusations that the defendant’s son sexually abused her?” (2) “Whether the Appellate Court was correct in upholding the trial court’s refusal to allow the defendant to cross-examine D’s mother about the sleeping arrangements in the home?” State v. Morales, 242 Conn. 903, 697 A.2d 689 (1997).

We also granted a cross petition for certification by the state limited to the following issue: “Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s conviction for sexual assault in the first degree constituted a violation of the ex post facto clause of the federal constitution?” State v. Morales, 242 Conn. 904, 697 A.2d 690 (1997).