Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Mut. Commc'ns Assocs., Inc., 814 A.2d 377 (Conn. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Mut. Commc'ns Assocs., Inc., 814 A.2d 377 (Conn. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2010 · …under the applicable equitable principles, the plaintiff was entitled to the full amount of the deficiency judgment in this case ✓
31 citation events (31 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
v.
MUTUAL COMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATES, INC.
SC 16645.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 4, 2003.
814 A.2d 377
2003 Conn. LEXIS 6
Michael S. Lynch, with whom was A. Reynolds Gordon, for the appellants (defendant Jerome G. Terracino et al.)., John B. Farley, with whom was James V. Somers, for the appellee (substitute plaintiff Fairway Asset Management, Inc.).
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case[*360] should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.[1]

The appeal is dismissed.

1

We granted the defendants’ petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court; Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Mutual Communications Associates, Inc., 66 Conn. App. 397, 784 A.2d 970 (2001); limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the applicable equitable principles, the plaintiff was entitled to the full amount of the deficiency judgment in this case.” Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Mutual Communications Associates, Inc., 258 Conn. 949, 788 A.2d 98 (2001).