Brandon v. State, 23 So. 517 (Miss. 1898). · Go Syfert
Brandon v. State, 23 So. 517 (Miss. 1898). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2009 · …very doubtfully balanced state of the testimony
12 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jordan Brandon
v.
The State of Mississippi
Mississippi Supreme Court.
Mar 15, 1898.
23 So. 517
George C. Paine and Alexander & Alexander, for appellant., W. N. Nash, attorney-general, for the state., Argued orally by Chalmers Alexander and G. H. Alexander, for appellant, and by Wiley N. Nash, attorney-general, for the state.
Whitfield.
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published
Whitfield, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Lucy Brandon was plainly committed to jail, under § 1384 of the code of 1892, in the course of the trial, in the presence and hearing of the jury. In the very doubtfully balanced state of the testimony this is fatal error. Golden v. State, ante, p. 130. The tenth instruction for the state is misleading and erroneous. An unnecessary killing could not be predicated of appellant’s killing deceased, if at the time deceased had his pistol drawn and was killed by defendant to save his own life.[*907] The only felony deceased could have been attempting, on the testimony, was the killing of his father, and killing by appellant to prevent being killed, if the jury believed the witnesses for the defense, was not an unnecessry killing. As to the cross appeal, it is only necessary to say that the court properly refused the sixth instruction for the state. Herman v. State, ante, p. 340.

Judgment reversed, verchict set aside and cause remanded.