Lavender v. Clark, 329 U.S. 674 (1946). · Go Syfert
Lavender v. Clark, 329 U.S. 674 (1946). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1950 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1950 1988 2026
Cited for
91 L. Ed. at 598 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Roland Int'l Corp. v. Najjar, 407 A.2d 1032 (Del. 1979). 2 cites
    No. 155, 1979. . 1 Pomeroy’s Equity Jurisprudence (5th Ed.) § 131, p. 180, “The discretionary exercise or nonexercise of equitable . . . jurisdiction . in one case is not precedent in another case where the facts differ.” Cook v. Fortson,…
Other citing cases2 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lavender, Administrator
v.
Clark, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Missouri
No. 20.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 21, 1946.
329 U.S. 674
1946 U.S. LEXIS 1880
N. Murry Edwards-, James A. Waechter and Douglas H. Jones for petitioner., Maurice G. Roberts, Cornelius H. Skinker, Jr., William R. Gentry, Charles A. Helsell and John W. Freels for respondents.
Are, Black, Granted, Issue, Leave, Murphy, Rule, Should, Show.
Cited by 20 opinions  |  Published

The motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Murphy, and Mr. Justice Rutledge are of the opinion that leave to file should be granted and that a rule to show cause should issue.