Bowers v. Remington Rand, Inc., 330 U.S. 843 (1947). · Go Syfert
Bowers v. Remington Rand, Inc., 330 U.S. 843 (1947). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: 11 Fair empl.prac.cas. 167, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,368 United States of America v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, Inc., Sidney S. Harris, Intervenors-Appellants, National Organization for Women, Inc., Movants-Appellants (ca5, 1975-08-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1947 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1947 1986 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." 11 Fair empl.prac.cas. 167, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,368 United States of America v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, Inc., Sidney S. Harris, Intervenors-Appellants, National Organization for Women, Inc., Movants-Appellants
5th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Bowers v. Remington Rand, Inc., 7 Cir. 1946, 159 F.2d 114 , cert. denied, 330 U.S. 843 , 67 S.Ct. 1083 , 91 L.Ed. 1288 (1947) (employer and employee may settle by agreement question whether sleeping time at jobsite constitutes working time). 94 Nor did the decisions of the Supreme Court on similar questions under other statutes yield any indication that the O'Neil-Schulte strict FLSA approach would be extended.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, Inc.
5th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Bowers v. Remington Rand, Inc., 7 Cir. 1946, 159 F.2d 114 , cert. denied, 330 U.S. 843 , 67 S.Ct. 1083 , 91 L.Ed. 1288 (1947) (employer and employee may settle by agreement question whether sleeping time at jobsite constitutes working time).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bowers
v.
Remington Rand, Inc.
No. 995.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 31, 1947.
330 U.S. 843
Harold Leventhal for petitioners. Acting Solicitor General Washington, Assistant Attorney General Sonnett and Samuel D. Slade for respondent.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.