Black Diamond Lines, Inc. v. Pioneer Imp. Corp., 331 U.S. 821 (1947). · Go Syfert
Search
Black Diamond Lines, Inc. v. Pioneer Imp. Corp., 331 U.S. 821 (1947). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
43 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Praxair, Inc. v. Mayflower Transit Inc. (nysd, 1996-01-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951 1988 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Praxair, Inc. v. Mayflower Transit Inc. (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pioneer Import Corp. v. The Lafcomo, 159 F.2d 654 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 821 , 67 S.Ct. 1310 , 91 L.Ed. 1838 (1947); The Sarnia, 278 F. 459 (2d Cir.1921), cert. denied, 258 U.S. 625 , 42 S.Ct. 382 , 66 L.Ed. 797 (1922).
discussed Cited "see" Barrett Moving & Storage Co. v. All States Air Cargo, Inc. (2×)
N.D. Ill. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pioneer Import Corp. v. The Lafcomo, 159 F.2d 654, 654-55 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 821 , 67 S.Ct. 1310 , 91 L.Ed. 1838 (1947); Yutana Barge Lines v. Northland Services, 574 F.Supp. 1003, 1005 (W.D.Wash.1983); Jones v. The Flying Clipper, 116 F.Supp. 386, 387 (S.D.N.Y.1953).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Agfa-Gevaert, Inc. v. S/S \TFL ADAMS\"" (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Pioneer Import Corp. v. The Lafcomo, 159 F.2d 654 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 821 , 67 S.Ct. 1310 , 91 L.Ed. 1838 (1947); Jones v. The Flying Clipper, 116 F.Supp. 386 (S.D.N.Y.1953); see also Margarite, 556 F.Supp. at 218 (“improper stowage constituted a ‘deviation in law’ ”); United States v. Wessel, Duval & Co., Inc., 115 F.Supp. 678, 684 (S.D.N.Y.1953) (“acceptance of a breach of contract for special stowage of cargo as a deviation,” citing Pioneer Import).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bernard Austin v. United States (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1967 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., in addition to Bostic, Bullock and Frady, discussed supra, Thomas v. United States, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 314 , 158 F.2d 97 (1946), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 822 , 67 S.Ct. 1303 , 91 L.Ed. 1838 (1947) 15 The Government argues that the instruction as given 'implicitly includes the concept of an appreciable time lapse.' No reason is advanced why the judge might properly have refused the requested instruction.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Black Diamond Lines, Inc.
v.
Pioneer Import Corp.
No. 1207.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 5, 1947.
331 U.S. 821
John W. Crandall and Arthur M. Boal for petitioners. George C. Sprague for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.