green
Positive treatment
1.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1948 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1948
1987
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re the Arbitration Between El Hoss Engineering & Transport Co. & American Independent Oil Co.
See, also, United States v. Wilson, 7 Cir., 160 F.2d 745 , certiorari denied 331 U.S. 860 , 67 S.Ct. 1757 , 91 L.Ed. 1867 , rehearing denied 332 U.S. 787 , 68 S.Ct. 37 , 92 L.Ed. 370 ; Omnium Freighting Corp. v. United Steamship Corp., Sup.Ct., 1st Dept., 15 Misc. 2d 800 , 185 N.Y.S.2d 857 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Securities & Exchange Commission
v.
Engineers Public Service Co. and Engineers Public Service Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
v.
Engineers Public Service Co. and Engineers Public Service Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
No. 1; No. 2.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 20, 1947.
Milton V. Freeman argued the cause for the Securities & Exchange Commission., With him on the brief were J. Howard McGrath, then Solicitor General, Paul A. Freund, Roger S. Foster and Louis Loss., William E. Tucker and T. Justin Moore argued the cause for respondents in No. 1 and petitioners in No. 2., With them on the brief were Paul Duryea Miller and George D. Gibson. Allen E. Throop and Carlos L. Israels filed a brief for Driscoll et al., as amici curiae, urging reversal., Solicitor General Perlman was also on the joint motion of counsel for the parties to vacate the judgment below.
Cases, Consideration, Took.
Cited by 36 opinions | Published
Per Curiam:
The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is vacated and the cases are remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the petition for review as moot, on joint motion of counsel for the parties.
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.