Seatrain Lines, Inc. v. West India Fruit & S.S. Co., 336 U.S. 908 (1949). · Go Syfert
Search
Seatrain Lines, Inc. v. West India Fruit & S.S. Co., 336 U.S. 908 (1949). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hartman v. Edmondson (kan, 1955-05-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Hartman v. Edmondson
Kan. · 1955 · confidence medium
See, e. g., Kneisley v. Hudspeth, 161 Kan. 772 , 173 P. 2d 247 ; Kendall v. Hudspeth, 162 Kan. 307, 308 , 176 P. 2d 254 ; Smith v. Hudspeth, 162 Kan. 361, 364 , 176 P. 2d 262 ; Long v. Hudspeth, 164 Kan. 720 , 192 P. 2d 169 ; Pyle v. Hudspeth, 166 Kan. 62 , 199 P. 2d 469 , certiorari denied, 336 U. S. 907 , 69 Sup. Ct. 487, 93 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Seatrain Lines, Inc.
v.
West India Fruit & Steamship Co., Inc.
No. 482.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 7, 1949.
336 U.S. 908
1949 U.S. LEXIS 2778
Arthur L. Winn, Jr. for petitioner. William Radner, Odell Kominers, Frank J. McConnell, Joseph M. Rault and Arthur M. Boal for the West India Fruit & S. S. Co.; Joseph Walker for Loftin et al., Trustees; and S. Stanley Kreutser for McCauley, respondents.
Cited by 26 opinions  |  Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed on motion of counsel for the petitioner.