green
Positive treatment
published
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951
1988
2026
Cited for
Other citing cases
- In re Faiola, 185 F. Supp. 564 (D.N.J. 1960).published
- United States v. Lee Wan Nam, A/K/A Hong Lee, 274 F.2d 863 (2d Cir. 1960).published
- United States v. Sharpnack, 355 U.S. 286 (1958).published
- United States v. Rossello, 107 F. Supp. 621 (W.D. Pa. 1952).published
- Watters v. State, 578 A.2d 810 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1990).published
- Carroll v. Finch, 326 F. Supp. 891 (D. Alaska 1971).published
- United States v. Charles Herschel Dimsdale, 410 F.2d 358 (5th Cir. 1969).published
- Kemart Corp., a Corp. v. Printing Arts Rsch. Labs., Inc., a Corp., 269 F.2d 375 (9th Cir. 1959).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Shoreline Cooperative Apartments, Inc.
v.
Shoreline Cooperative Apartments, Inc.
No. 334.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 12, 1949.
Published opinion
Solicitor General Perlman argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Robert L. Stern, Ed Dupree, Hugo V. Prucha and Nathan Siegel. Mayer Goldberg and George S. Stansell argued the cause for appellees. Mr. Goldberg also filed a brief for the Shoreline Cooperative Apartments, Inc. et al., appellees. Kenart M. Rahn was with Mr. Stansell on the brief for Lumsden et al., appellees.
Cited by 38 opinions | Published
Per Curiam:
The judgment is reversed. Woods v. Miller Co., 333 U. S. 138.