State v. Segoine, 25 A. 963 (N.J. 1891). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Segoine, 25 A. 963 (N.J. 1891). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Cromwell v. Hillsborough TP. (ca3, 1945-05-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Cromwell v. Hillsborough TP. (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1945 · signal: see · confidence high
See State (Maxson et al., Prosecutors) v. Segoine, Collector, 1891, 53 N.J.L. 339 , 21 A. 852 , aff’d 1891, 54 N.J.L. 212 , 25 A. 963 ; State, Wharton, Prosecutor v. A. E.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
THE STATE, CHARLES W. MAXSON, PROSECUTORS, IN ERROR
v.
WILLIAM SEGOINE, IN ERROR
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Nov 15, 1891.
25 A. 963
1891 N.J. LEXIS 2
For the plaintiffs in error, Frank P. McDermott., For the defendant in error, Peter Backes.
Published
Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.

[*213] For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Magie, Reed, Bogert, Brown, Clement, Smith, Whitaker. 10.

For reversal — None.