Dilks v. Kelsey, 63 A. 1118 (N.J. 1906). · Go Syfert
Search
Dilks v. Kelsey, 63 A. 1118 (N.J. 1906). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SARAH DILKS, IN ERROR
v.
ORLANDO KELSEY, IN ERROR
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jun 18, 1906.
63 A. 1118
1906 N.J. LEXIS 103
For the plaintiff in error, Timothy J. Middleton and John J. Crandall., For the defendant in error, Watkins & Avis.
Affirmance, Bogert, Cueiam, Fort, Gray, Greeij, Hendrickson, None, Pitney, Reversal, Swayze, Vredenburgh, Vroom.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
Per Cueiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court, affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court, in proceedings under the Landlord and Tenant act, is now affirmed on the grounds stated in the per curiam memorandum filed in the Supreme Court, and reported in 59 Atl. Rep. 897.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Greeij, Gray. 10. For reversal. — None.