State v. Harned, 64 A. 1134 (N.J. 1906). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Harned, 64 A. 1134 (N.J. 1906). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
THE STATE, IN ERROR
v.
RUDOLPH F. HARNED, IN ERROR
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jun 18, 1906.
64 A. 1134
1906 N.J. LEXIS 106
Eor the plaintiff in error, Samuel Kalisch., Eor the defendant in error, Samuel A. Atkinson, prosecutor of the pleas.
Affirmance, Bogert, Dill, Garrison, Gray, Green, Hendrickson, None, Pitney, Reed, Reversal, Swayze, Vredenburgh, Vroom.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The judgment brought up by this writ of error is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Port, in the Supreme Court, in the case of State v. Davis, reported in 43 Vroom 345.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill. 12. For reversal — None.