green
Positive treatment
Issue: reasonable suspicion standardSC ↗
Issue: abandonment exceptionSC ↗
Issue: consideration factorsSC ↗
Issue: reasonable suspicion analysisDC ↗
Quoted verbatim 3×
53.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2018–2019 ·
…rather, appellate courts must affirm if there is any evidence to support the trial court's ruling.
at p. 900
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2016 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2016
2021
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
State v. Hattar
rather, appellate courts must affirm if there is any evidence to support the trial court's ruling.
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
State v. Heyward
rather, appellate courts must affirm if there is any evidence to support the trial court's ruling.
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
State v. Spears
(3×)
also: Cited as authority (rule)
general nervousness will almost invariably be present in a traffic stop.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Justin T. Hopkins
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
"This inquiry involves the totality of the circumstances, and '[c]ourts must give due weight to common sense judgments reached by officers in light of their experience and training.'" Id. (alteration by court) (quoting State v. Moore, 415 S.C. 245 , 252- 53, 781 S.E.2d 897, 901 (2016)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Meredith Logan Whitehurst v. Town of Sullivan's Island
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Further, this Court has recognized the common usage of the term reasonable, explaining "[t]he objective 'reasonable' test is used in many areas of the law as an appropriate determinant of liability and thus a guide to conduct." Baker, 315 S.C. at 152-53 , 432 S.E.2d at 474 (quoting Eanes, 569 A.2d at 616 ); see e.g., State v. Moore, 415 S.C. 245, 252 , 781 S.E.2d 897, 900 (2016) ("The Fourth Amendment provides in relevant part that '[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.'" (alterat…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Rowland
This inquiry involves the totality of the circumstances, and "[c]ourts must give due weight to common sense judgments reached by officers in light of their experience and training." State v. Moore, 415 S.C. 245, 252-53 , 781 S.E.2d 897, 901 (2016). 437 S.C. at 635, 879 S.E.2d at 767 (second alteration in original).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Michael N. Frasier, Jr.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
This inquiry involves the totality of the circumstances, and "[c]ourts must give due weight to common sense judgments reached by officers in light of their experience and training." State v. Moore, 415 S.C. 245, 252-53 , 781 S.E.2d 897, 901 (2016).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Sheldon Alonzo Watson
Accordingly, we affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Moore, 415 S.C. 245, 251 , 781 S.E.2d 897, 900 (2016) ("On appeals from a motion to suppress based on Fourth Amendment grounds, [appellate courts apply] a deferential standard of review and will reverse if there is clear error." (quoting State v. Adams, 409 S.C. 641, 647 , 763 S.E.2d 341 , 344 (2014))); id. ("The 'clear error' standard means that an appellate court will not reverse a trial court's finding of fact simply because it would have decided the case differently." (quoting State v. Pichardo, …
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Stewart
State v. Moore, 415 S.C. 245, 251 , 781 S.E.2d 897, 900 (2016).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Frasier
(4×)
also: Cited "see"
"The term 'reasonable suspicion' requires a particularized and objective basis that would lead one to suspect another of criminal activity." Pichardo, 367 S.C. at 104 , 623 S.E.2d at 851 . "[C]ourts must give due weight to common sense judgments reached by officers in light of their experience and training." Moore, 415 S.C. at 252-53 , 781 S.E.2d at 901 (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Taylor, 401 S.C. 104, 113 , 736 S.E.2d 663, 667 (2013)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Simmons
State v. Moore, 415 S.C. 245, 251 , 781 S.E.2d 897, 900 (2016).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Moore
State v. Moore, 415 S.C. 245, 251 , 781 S.E.2d 897, 900 (2016) (citation omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Flannery
As to whether the circuit court erred in affirming the finding of reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop: State v. Moore, 415 S.C. 245, 252 , 781 S.E.2d 897, 900 (2016) (stating the violation of a motor vehicle law provides reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop); State v. Provet, 405 S.C. 101, 107 , 747 S.E.2d 453, 456 (2013) ("South Carolina appellate courts review Fourth Amendment determinations under a clear error standard."); State v. Brockman, 339 S.C. 57, 66 , 528 S.E.2d 661, 666 (2000) (stating the appellate court will "affirm if there is any evidence to support the [trial …
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Hayes
As to issue 1: State v. Moore, 415 S.C. 245, 251 , 781 S.E.2d 897, 900 (2016) ("On appeals from a motion to suppress based on Fourth Amendment grounds, this [c]ourt applies a deferential standard of review and will reverse if there is clear error." (quoting State v. Adams, 409 S.C. 641, 647 , 763 S.E.2d 341 , 344 (2014))); id. ("The 'clear error' standard means that an appellate court will not reverse a trial court's finding of fact simply because it would have decided the case differently." (quoting State v. Pichardo, 367 S.C. 84, 96 , 623 S.E.2d 840, 846 (Ct. App. 2005))); id. ("Rather, appe…
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Alston
(7×)
also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
Further, this Court has emphasized that "[c]ourts must give due weight to common sense judgments reached by **282 officers in light of their experience and training." Moore , 415 S.C. at 252 -53 , 781 S.E.2d at 901 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Bash
But those cases merely hold that a stop or search that is objectively reasonable is not vitiated by the fact that the officer's real 7 See, e.g., State v. Moore, 415 S.C. 245, 252 , 781 S.E.2d 897, 901 (2016) (regarding an officer's justification for extending a traffic stop); State v. Provet, 405 S.C. 101, 108 , 747 S.E.2d 453, 457 (2013) (regarding the existence of reasonable suspicion); Wright, 391 S.C. at 444 , 706 S.E.2d at 328 (regarding the existence of exigent circumstances); State v. Banda, 371 S.C. 245 , 252 n.3, 639 S.E.2d 36 , 40 n.3 (2006) (regarding the existence of reasonable su…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Bash
The key distinction between this case and Wright is the officers in Wright had probable cause to believe a crime was in progress before they departed their path to the front door, and immediately thereafter, they observed exigent circumstances to excuse 7 See, e.g., State v. Moore, 415 S.C. 245, 252 , 781 S.E.2d 897, 901 (2016) (regarding an officer's justification for extending a traffic stop); State v. Provet, 405 S.C. 101, 108 , 747 S.E.2d 453, 457 (2013) (regarding the existence of reasonable suspicion); Wright, 391 S.C. at 444 , 706 S.E.2d at 328 (regarding the existence of exigent circum…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Spears
See State v. Moore, 415 S.C. 245, 255 , 781 S.E.2d 897 , 902 (2016) (citing a law enforcement officer's "extensive experience" in drug interdiction in support of common sense judgments); United States v. Lender, 985 F.2d 151, 154 (4th Cir. 1993) ("Courts are not remiss in crediting the practical experience of officers who observe on a daily basis what transpires on the street.").
discussed
Cited "see"
Nathan P. Jackson v. United States
(2×)
App. 2013) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see State v. Moore, 781 S.E.2d 897, 902 (S.C. 2016) (criticizing “law enforcement’s reliance on the seemingly omnipresent factor of nervousness”), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 2473 (2016).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Re DESIGNATION OF ASSOCIATE CHIEF MAGISTRATE IN CLARENDON COUNTY
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Jan 26, 2016.
Carolina, Pleicones.
Published
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that Judge M. Nannette Frye be designated as Associate Chief Judge for Administrative Purposes of the Summary Courts for Clarendon County and her authority shall include, but not be limited to, the administrative purposes and acts set forth in my Order dated January 1, 2016, designating Chief Judges statewide.
The authority conferred on the Interim Associate Chief Judge for Administrative Purposes of the Summary Courts for Clarendon County by this Order shall become effective imme[*245] diately and shall continue through June 30, 2016, unless changed or revoked by Order of the Chief Justice.
s/Costa M. Pleicones Costa M. Pleicones Chief Justice of South Carolina