green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Bunge Agribusiness Singapore Pte. Ltd. v. Dalian Hualiang Enterprise Group Co.
See Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw, LLP, 719 F.3d 785, 797-98 (7th Cir.2013) cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1026 , 188 L.Ed.2d 120 (2014).
cited
Cited "see"
King Ex Rel. Estate of King v. Kramer
See Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw, LLP, 719 F.3d 785, 795 (7th Cir.2013), ce rt. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 1026 , 188 L.Ed.2d 120 (2014).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eason v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF BOULDER
See Gilbert v. Homar, 520 U.S. 924 , 117 S.Ct. 1807 , 188 L.Ed.2d 120 (1997); United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property, 510 U.S. 48 , 114 S.Ct. 492 , 126 L.Ed.2d 490 (1998); Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co., 455 U.S. 422 , 102 S.Ct. 1148 , 71 L.Ed.2d 265 (1982); see also Watso v. Colorado Department of Social Services, 841 P.2d 299 (Colo.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Floyd v. City of New York
See, e.g., Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw, LLP, 719 F.3d 785, 798 , 798 n. 10 (7th Cir.2013), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1026 , 188 L.Ed.2d 120 (2014) (expressing skepticism that the Rule 24 applicant’s asserted interests — his personal and professional reputation, his ability to earn a living as a financial advisor, and his CFA credential — are direct, significant legally protectable interests); Flynn, 782 F.2d at 1093 (a Rule 24 applicant who “merely claims a generalized injury to reputation, but identifies no legal detriment arising from a default judgment” should n…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Patricia A. BANKERT, Individually and in Her Capacity As Personal Representative of Estate of Jonathan W. Bankert, Sr.
v.
Norman W. BERNSTEIN
v.
Norman W. BERNSTEIN
No. 13–568..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 27, 2014.
571 U.S. 1175
2014 WL 273271
2014 U.S. LEXIS 903
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.