green
Positive treatment
6.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Xerox Corp.
See Augustus v. Nassau, 596 Fed.Appx. 41, 42 (2d Cir.2015) (“Given the evidence of [the plaintiffs] repeated failures to complete important aspects of her job and the dearth of evidence supporting the existence of a discriminatory animus, the dis trict court did not err in finding that [the plaintiff] did not show by a preponderance of the evidence that [the] defendant’s nondiscriminatory justification was merely a pretext for racial discrimination.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 171 , 193 L.Ed.2d 139 (2015); Smith v. Am.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sadler
We do not purport to decide whether Mr. Sadler could actually have been convicted of kidnapping beyond a reasonable doubt under federal or Wyoming law because "§ 2X1.1, when cross-referenced by § 2K2.1(c), does not require a conviction before a district court may use the guideline provision applicable to the conduct underly *838 ing the firearm offense.” United States v. O’Flanagan, 339 F.3d 1229, 1234 (10th Cir.2003). 5 . "[C]ommentary in the Guidelines Manual that interprets or explains a guideline is authoritative unless it violates the Constitution or a federal statute, or is inconsi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re World Marketing Chicago, LLC
Aug. 11, 2015) (analyzing “the plain language of the commentary” to reach its holding); see also, e.g., United States v. Evans, 782 F.3d 1115 , 1117 (10th Cir. 2015) (same), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 171 , 193 L.Ed.2d 138 (2015); United States v. Peroceski, 520 F.3d 886, 888 (8th Cir. 2008) (same); United States v. Akinsuroju, 166 Fed.Appx. 748, 751 (5th Cir. 2006) (same); United States v. Miller, 206 F.3d 1051 , 1052 (11th Cir. 2000) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jesse EVANS
v.
UNITED STATES.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 15–5011..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 2015.
84 U.S.L.W. 3170
2015 U.S. LEXIS 6018
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.