green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
26.2 score
“habeas jurisdiction is proper 1 where a challenge to the prison conditions would, if successful, necessarily accelerate the 2 prisoner's release.”
Treatment trajectory · 2017 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2017
2021
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
(HC) Martin v. Johnson
habeas jurisdiction is 9 proper where a challenge to the prison conditions would, if successful, necessarily accelerate the 10 prisoner's release.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
(HC) Olic v. Lizarraga
habeas jurisdiction is proper 22 where a challenge to the prison conditions would, if successful, necessarily accelerate the 23 prisoner's release.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
(HC) Harris v. Perry
habeas jurisdiction is proper 1 where a challenge to the prison conditions would, if successful, necessarily accelerate the 2 prisoner's release.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
(HC) Norman v. Robertson
Preiser, 411 U.S. at 499 n.14. 2 In Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 934-35 (9th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 645 3 (2017), the Ninth Circuit held that a prisoner's claim which, if successful, will not necessarily lead to 4 immediate or speedier release from custody falls outside the “core of habeas corpus” and must be 5 pursued (if at all) in a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , rather than in a habeas action. 6 Nettles, 830 F.3d at 927-28 ; see, e.g., Borstad v. Hartley, 668 Fed.Appx. 696, 697 (9th Cir. 2016) 7 (success on petitioners' claims that the lengthening of i…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Mustafaa v. Davis
As explained below, because success on any of his 20 claims would not shorten or end his sentence, he can pursue his claims only in a civil rights action 21 – if he can pursue them at all in federal court. 22 In Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 934-35 (9th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 645 23 (2017), the Ninth Circuit held that that a prisoner’s claim which, if successful, will not necessarily 24 lead to immediate or speedier release from custody falls outside the “core of habeas corpus” and 25 must be pursued (if at all) in a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , rathe…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Smith v. Pearman
A Claim To Enforce Rights Under Proposition 57 Must Be Brought In A Civil Rights Action, If It May Be Brought In Federal Court At All 2 In Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 934-35 (9th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 645 3 (2017), the Ninth Circuit held that that a prisoner’s claim which, if successful, will not necessarily 4 lead to immediate or speedier release from custody falls outside the “core of habeas corpus” and 5 must be pursued (if at all) in a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , rather than in a habeas 6 action.
cited
Cited "see"
Brandon Bibbs v. United States
See Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 927 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 645 (2017).
discussed
Cited "see"
Camacho Lopez
See Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 927 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 645 (2017) (mem.); Spencer v. Haynes, 774 F.3d 467, 469-70 (8th Cir. 2014); Robinson v. Sherrod, 631 F.3d 839, 840-41 (7th Cir. 2011).
cited
Cited "see"
(PC) Mansour v. CDCR
See 24 Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 927-28 (9th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 645 25 (2017); Blanco v. Asuncion, No. 18CV2005-JLS(KSC), 2019 WL 2144452 , at *3 (S.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Chris Carter v. Jim Robertson
See Badea v. Cox, 931 21 || F.2d 573, 574 (9th Cir. 1991) (discussing same).' 22 23 ‘Although a district court, after notifying and obtaining informed consent from a prisoner, 34 || may construe a habeas petition to plead a civil rights claim if the petition is amenable to conversion on its face, see Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 935-36 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc), 25 || cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 645 (2017), the Court declines to do so here.
discussed
Cited "see"
(PC) Ausborn v. CHCF California
See 17 Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 935 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 645 18 (2017) (claims falling within the “core” of habeas are those that would “necessarily lead to [the 19 petitioner’s] immediate or earlier release from confinement”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burns v. State of Hawaii Corp.
See Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 934-35 (9th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 645 (2017) (holding claims that will not necessarily lead to immediate or speedier release fall outside the “core of habeas corpus” and must be brought, if at all, in a civil rights action). 10 V.
discussed
Cited "see"
(PC) Ausborn v. CHCF California
See Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 935 (9th Cir. 2016) (en 22 banc), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 645 (2017) (claims falling within the “core” of habeas are those 23 that would “necessarily lead to [the petitioner’s] immediate or earlier release from confinement”). 24 Claims that do not implicate the duration of custody are properly brought in a civil rights action 25 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph Nichols III v. Christian Pfeiffer
See Nettles 7 v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 934 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (under California law, the 8 parole board must consider all relevant reliable information in determining 9 suitability for parole and has the authority to deny parole on the basis of any 10 grounds presently available to it), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 645 (2017).
discussed
Cited "see"
David Patkins v. K. Holland
See Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 934-35 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (holding that claims fall outside “the core of habeas corpus” if success will not necessarily lead *495 to immediate or earlier release from confinement), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 645 , 196 L.Ed.2d 542 (2017).
discussed
Cited "see"
John Free v. G. Swarthout
See Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 934-35 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (holding that claims fall outside “the core of, habeas corpus” if success will not necessarily lead to immediate or earlier release from confinement), cer t. denied, 580 U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 645 , 196 L.Ed.2d 542 (2017) ; Phelps v. Alameda, 366 F.3d 722, 727-28, 730 (9th Cir. 2004) (merits panel has the power to rule on the propriety of a COA).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shelby Byrd v. Eric Arnold
See Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 934-35 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (holding that claims fall outside “the core of habeas corpus” if success will not necessarily lead to immediate or earlier release from confinement), cert. denied, 580 U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 645 , 196 L.Ed.2d 542 (2017); Phelps v. Alameda, 366 F.3d 722, 727-28, 730 (9th Cir. 2004) (merits panel has the power to rule on the propriety of a COA).
discussed
Cited "see"
David Dugan v. Gary Swarthout
See Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 934-35 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (holding that claims fall outside “the core of habeas corpus” if success will not necessarily lead to immediate or earlier release from confinement), cert. denied, 580 U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 645 , 196 L.Ed.2d 542 (2017)); Phelps v. Alameda, 366 F.3d 722, 727-28, 730 (9th Cir. 2004) (merits panel has the power to rule on the propriety of a COA).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dan Carter v. Ronald Davis
See Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 934-35 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (holding that .claims fall outside “the core of habeas corpus” if success will not necessarily lead to immediate or earlier release from confinement), cert. denied, 580 U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 645 , 196 L.Ed.2d 542 (2017); Phelps v. Alameda, 366 F.3d 722, 727-28, 730 (9th Cir. 2004) (merits panel has the power to rule on the propriety of a COA).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jimmie Stephen v. Robert W. Fox
See Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 934-35 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (holding that claims fall outside “the core of habeas corpus” if success will not necessarily lead to immediate or earlier release from confinement), cert. denied, 580 U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 645 , 196 L.Ed.2d 542 (2017); Phelps v. Alameda, 366 F.3d 722, 727-28, 730 (9th Cir. 2004) (merits panel has the power to rule on the propriety of a COA).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anthony Alto v. Ron Davis
See Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 934-35 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (holding that claims fall outside “the core of habeas corpus” if success will not necessarily' lead to immediate or earlier release from confinement), cert. denied, 580 U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 645 , 196 L.Ed.2d 542 (2017); Phelps v. Alameda, 366 F.3d 722, 727-28, 730 (9th Cir. 2004) (merits panel has the.power to rule on the propriety of a COA).
discussed
Cited "see"
John Steelman v. Shawn Hatton
See Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 934-35 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (holding that claims fall outside “the core of habeas corpus” if success will not necessarily lead to immediate or earlier release from confinement), cert. denied, 580 U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 645 , 196 L.Ed.2d 542 (2017); Phelps v. Alameda, 366 F.3d 722, 727-28, 730 (9th Cir. 2004) (merits panel has the power to rule on the propriety of a COA).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dennis Hamilton v. Board of Parole Hearing
See Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 934-35 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (holding that claims fall outside “the core of habeas corpus” if success will not necessarily lead to immediate or earlier release from confinement), cert. denied, 580 U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 645 , 196 L.Ed.2d 542 (2017); Phelps v. Alameda, 366 F.3d 722, 727-28, 730 (9th Cir. 2004) (merits panel has the power to rule on the propriety of a COA).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
(PC) Stalling v. Stinson
The rule in Heck has been applied in the prison 4 disciplinary context when the “defect complained of by [plaintiff] would, if established, 5 necessarily imply the invalidity of the deprivation of his good-time credits[,]” Edwards v. 6 Balisok, 520 U.S. 641, 646 (1997) (emphasis added); Nonnette v. Small, 316 F.3d 872, 875 (9th 7 Cir. 2002), and if the restoration of those credits “necessarily” would “affect the duration of time 8 to be served[.]” Muhammed v. Close, 540 U.S. 749, 754 (2004) (per curiam); see also Nettles v. 9 Grounds, 830 F.3d 922 , 929 n.4 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
(PC) Moore v. Schlichting
This doctrine has been extended to apply in the prison disciplinary context 8 where the “defect complained of by [plaintiff] would, if established, necessarily imply the 9 invalidity of the deprivation of his good-time credits[,]” Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641 , 646 10 (1997); Nonnette v. Small, 316 F.3d 872, 875 (9th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1218 11 (2004), and if the restoration of those credits “necessarily” would “affect the duration of time to 12 be served.” Muhammed v. Close, 540 U.S. 749, 754 (2004) (per curiam); see also Nettles v. 13 Grounds, 830 F.3d 922 , 92…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hayes v. Nettles
See Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516 , 524–32 (2002); see also Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 932 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 645 , (2017). “[T]he PLRA exhaustion requirement requires proper exhaustion.” Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 88 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baruchyah Hawkins v. Harold Clarke
See id. at 624 ; see also Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 922, 935, 936 (9th Cir. 2016) (noting procedural and substantive differences between § 2254 and § 1983 actions, including the amount of filing fees, the means of collecting those fees, and the defendant to be named), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 645 , 196 L.Ed.2d 542 (2017).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James FORNEY
v.
FLORIDA.
v.
FLORIDA.
No. 16–6543..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 2017.
85 U.S.L.W. 3328
2017 WL 69726
2017 U.S. LEXIS 335
Published
Citer courts: E.D. California (2)
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and the petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida dismissed. See Rule 39.8.