Viloski v. United States, 85 U.S.L.W. 3415 (2017). · Go Syfert
Search
Viloski v. United States, 85 U.S.L.W. 3415 (2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Seramonte Associates, LLC v. Hamden (connappct, 2021-02-02)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Seramonte Associates, LLC v. Hamden
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
With respect to the federal constitution, the court held that the tax penalty in § 12- 63c is remedial, rather than punitive, because ‘‘it is imposed to ensure compliance with the timely payment of taxes and to deter delinquent payment of taxes, which could harm the government with additional expenses of ensuring compliance in collecting those taxes.’’ Accordingly, because the federal excessive fines clause applies only to those forfeitures that may be characterized as ‘‘punitive’’; see United States v. Viloski, 814 F.3d 104, 109 (2d Cir. 2016), cert. denied, U.S. , 137 S. Ct.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Benjamin VILOSKI
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 16–508..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 6, 2017.
85 U.S.L.W. 3415
2017 WL 856070
2017 U.S. LEXIS 1579
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.