People v. Holt, 721 N.W.2d 176 (Mich. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Holt, 721 N.W.2d 176 (Mich. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, 2016–2017 · …primary inquiry is whether 'the area harbors the intimate activity associated with the sanctity of . . . the home and the privacies of life. ⚠ not in text Topic ↗
16 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People of Michigan v. Michael Andrew Radandt (michctapp, 2014-12-02)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" People of Michigan v. Michael Andrew Radandt
Mich. Ct. App. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v Powell, 477 Mich 860, 861 ; 721 NW2d 180 (2006), citing United States v Dunn, 480 US 294, 301 ; 107 S Ct 1134 ; 94 L Ed 2d 326 (1987).
cited Cited "see, e.g." People of Michigan v. Dennis Keith Towne
Mich. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence medium
Dunn, 480 US at 301-303 ; see also Powell, 477 Mich at 861 (applying the four-factor Dunn test).
cited Cited "see, e.g." People of Michigan v. Dennis Keith Towne
Mich. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence medium
Dunn, 480 US at 301-303 ; see also Powell, 477 Mich at 861 (applying the four-factor Dunn test).
cited Cited "see, e.g." People of Michigan v. Dennis Keith Towne
Mich. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at 301-303 ; see also Powell, 477 Mich at 861 ; 721 NW2d at 180-181 (applying the four-factor Dunn test).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Sandy Sean HOLT, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
128034.
Michigan Supreme Court.
Sep 22, 2006.
721 N.W.2d 176
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 21, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCL 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether there was a violation of the 180-day rule, MCL 780.131, in this case in light of People v. Williams, 475 Mich. 245, 716 N.W.2d 208 (2006), and whether the time limitation set forth in MCL 780.131 is subject to waiver or extension for any reason, such as prosecutor good faith, mutual agreement of the parties, or time attributable to the defendant, including requests for adjournment.

The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.