Hills v. Ross, 3 U.S. 331 (1796). · Go Syfert
Hills v. Ross, 3 U.S. 331 (1796). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
15 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: MCKNIGHT v. United States (uscfc, 2025-07-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) MCKNIGHT v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2025 · confidence medium
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 3 U.S. 331, 339-40 (1948). “[P]auper status does not require absolute destitution[;] the question is whether the court costs can be paid without undue hardship.” Chamberlain v. United States, 655 Fed.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Robinson v. City of Las Vegas
D. Nev. · 2025 · confidence medium
Adkins v. E.I DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 3 U.S. 331, 339 (1948). 4 The applicant's affidavit must state the facts regarding the individual's poverty “with some 5 particularity, definiteness and certainty.” United States v. McQuade, 647 F.2d 938, 940 (9th Cir. 1981) 6 (citation omitted).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hills Et Al. Versus Ross
Supreme Court of the United States.
Aug 12, 1796.
3 U.S. 331
1796 U.S. LEXIS 411
Ingerfoll, contended, for the Plaintiffs in error,
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published
Bv the Court

: J.t appears, that the damages have been affeffed in the courts below, in relation to the value of the goods that were captured : but the Plaintiffs in error were not trefpaffers ab initio ; and, a£ting only as agents, they ihould be made anfwerable for no more than adlually came into their hands. The accounts of fales are regularly colledted and annexed to the record. We are, therefore, at no lofs for a criterion : And we think that the decree ihould be fo modified, as to charge them with the amount of fales, after deducing the duties on the goods, if the duties were paid by them.

The Decree was in the following words:—Ordered, That the decree of the Circuit Court for Georgia diftriét, pronounced on the 5th of May, 1795, be reverfed, fo far as the fame refpedls the faid Hills, May- and JVoodbridge ; and it is further ordered, that the faid Hills, May and Woodbridge, pay to the faid Walter Rofs, thirty-two thoufand and ninety dollars and fifty-eight cents,-the net amount of the fales of the cargo of the laid fliip, and five thoufand fix hundred and five dollars and twelve cents, intereft thereon, from the 6th day of June 1794, to the twelfth day of Augujl 1796, making together the fum of thirtv-feven thoufand fix hundred and ninety-five dollars and feventy cents, and that the faid Hills, May and Woodbridge, do .pay the cofts of fuit—and a fpecial mandate, &c.