Wontorski v. Williamsburg Mobile Homes, Inc., 794 N.E.2d 433 (Ind. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Wontorski v. Williamsburg Mobile Homes, Inc., 794 N.E.2d 433 (Ind. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Toby Hicks v. State of Indiana (indctapp, 2012-12-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Toby Hicks v. State of Indiana
Ind. Ct. App. · 2012 · confidence medium
See Ind. Appellate Rule 58(A); Wontorski v. Williamsburg Mobile Homes, Inc., 794 N.E.2d 433, 433 (Ind. 2003).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Commercial Credit Counseling Services, Inc. v. W.W. Grainger, Inc.
Ind. Ct. App. · 2006 · confidence medium
The term "attachment" encompasses creation of a security interest by execution of a security agreement between the parties, while "perfection" is an additional step that makes the security interest effective against third parties Fifth Third Bank v. Comanrk, Inc., 794 N.E.2d 433, 438 (Ind.Ct.App.2008).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Electrical Specialties, Inc. v. Siemens Building Technologies, Inc.
Ind. Ct. App. · 2005 · confidence medium
DECISION "On appeal, the standard of review of a grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment is the same as that used in the trial court: summary judgment is appropriate only where the designated evidence shows that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." Fifth Third Bank v. Comark, Inc., 794 N.E.2d 433, 437 (Ind.Ct.App.2003); see also Ind. Trial Rule 56(C).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Rice v. Hulsey
Ind. Ct. App. · 2005 · confidence medium
See Ind. Appellate Rule 58(A); Wontorski v. Williamsburg Mobile Homes, Inc., 794 N.E.2d 433, 433 (Ind.2003).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Polk v. State (2×) also: Cited "see"
Ind. Ct. App. · 2005 · confidence medium
See Ind. Appellate Rule 58(A); Wontorski v. Williamsburg Mobile Homes, Inc., 794 N.E.2d 433, 433 (Ind.2003).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Farm Credit Midsouth, PCA v. Reece Contracting, Inc.
Ark. · 2004 · confidence medium
“The purpose of a financing statement is to alert third parties to the existence of a security interest in property held by a debtor.” Fifth Third Bank v. Comark, Inc., 794 N.E.2d 433, 436 (Ind. 2003).
cited Cited as authority (rule) American United Life Insurance Co. v. Douglas
Ind. Ct. App. · 2004 · confidence medium
Fifth Third Bank v. Comark, Inc., 794 N.E.2d 433, 438 (Ind.Ct.App.2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WONTORSKI, John R., Et Al., Appellants,
v.
WILLIAMSBURG MOBILE HOMES, INC., Appellee
56S04-0303-CV-111.
Indiana Supreme Court.
Jul 9, 2003.
794 N.E.2d 433
2003 WL 21554319
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

In this case, the Court of Appeals held that a contractual forum-selection clause established preferred venue and that an action to foreclose a mechanic's lien need not be brought in the county in which the real estate is located,. See Wontorski v. Williamsburg Mobile Homes, Inc., 775 N.E.2d 691 (Ind.Ct.App.2002). This Court granted Appellants' petition to transfer by order dated March 14, 2008. Thus, the Court of Appeals' opinion in this case has been vacated and shall be held for naught. See Appellate Rule 58(A). By "Notice of Settlement" filed June 30, 2003, the parties have notified the Court that they have settled this matter.

Being duly advised, the Court now DISMISSES this appeal as moot.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this order to all counsel of record and to the Attorney General of Indiana.

All Justices concur.