green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Le v. Astrue
See United States v. Arizona, 346 U.S. 907 , 74 S.Ct. 239 , 98 L.Ed. 405 (1953) (per curiam) (citing Hoiness v. United States, 335 U.S. 297 , 69 S.Ct. 70 , 93 L.Ed. 16 (1948)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Firchau v. Diamond National Corp.
See, also, United States v. Arizona, 346 U.S. 907 , 74 S.Ct. 239 , 98 L.Ed. 405 ; Hoiness v. United States, 335 U.S. 297, 300 , 69 S.Ct. 70 , 93 L.Ed. 16 . .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tom We Shung
v.
Brownell, Attorney General
v.
Brownell, Attorney General
No. 241.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 7, 1953.
Jack Wasserman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Murray L. Schwartz argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg, J. F. Bishop, L. Paul Winings and Maurice A. Roberts.
Douglas, Jackson, Re, Verse.
Cited by 24 opinions | Published
Certiorari, 346 U. S. 854, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
Per Curiam:The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the complaint. Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U. S. 229.
Mr. Justice Black would re[*907] verse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Mb. Justice Douglas and Mb. Justice Jackson dissent. Jack Wasserman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Murray L. Schwartz argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg, J. F. Bishop, L. Paul Winings and Maurice A. Roberts.