Klock v. United States, 347 U.S. 960 (1954). · Go Syfert
Search
Klock v. United States, 347 U.S. 960 (1954). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the exclusion of witnesses from the courtroom is a matter resting in the sound discretion of the trial court and the exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed except in case of clear abuse.”
25 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Government of the Virgin Islands v. Edmund Edinborough (ca3, 1980-06-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Government of the Virgin Islands v. Edmund Edinborough
3rd Cir. · 1980 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the exclusion of witnesses from the courtroom is a matter resting in the sound discretion of the trial court and the exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed except in case of clear abuse.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Klock
v.
United States
No. 653.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 3, 1954.
347 U.S. 960
William W. Barron for petitioner., Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and John R. Wilkins for the United States.
Cited by 22 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1)

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.