MacNeil v. United States, 352 U.S. 912 (1956). · Go Syfert
Search
MacNeil v. United States, 352 U.S. 912 (1956). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Raymond G. Lasky v. Sheriff Lawrence Quinlan (ca2, 1977-07-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Raymond G. Lasky v. Sheriff Lawrence Quinlan
2d Cir. · 1977 · signal: see also · confidence low
Finally, while it may be argued that the Court itself has an interest in assuring that litigants comply with its orders, it is well established that a “civil contempt proceeding is wholly remedial, to serve only the purposes of the complaint, not to deter offenses against the public or to vindicate the authority of the court.” United States v. International Union, etc., 88 U.S.App.D.C. 341 , 190 F.2d 865, 873 (1951); see also MacNeil v. United States, 236 F.2d 149, 153-54 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 912 , 77 S.Ct. 150 , 1 L.Ed.2d 119 (1956).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MacNeil
v.
United States
No. 425.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 13, 1956.
352 U.S. 912
1956 U.S. LEXIS 226
Angus M. MacNeil, pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Olney and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Cited by 26 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.