green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
The Soundscriber Corporation v. The United States
See Scripto, Inc. v. Ferber Corporation, 267 F.2d 308 (3d Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 864 , 80 S.Ct. 122 , 4 L.Ed.2d 104 .
cited
Cited "see"
Soundscriber Corp. v. United States
See Scripto, Inc. v. Ferber Corporation, 267 F. 2d 308 , 121 U.S.P.Q. 339 (3d Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 864 .
examined
Cited "see"
Ex Parte George
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Retail Clerks Union v. Superior Court, 52 Cal.2d 222 , 339 P.2d 839 (1959), Cert. den. 361 U.S. 864 , 80 S.Ct. 120 , 4 L.Ed.2d 105 (1959).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen
v.
Anaconda Company and Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen
v.
Anaconda Company and Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen
No. 298; No. 311.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 19, 1959.
David L. Holland, Russell B. Day and Harold C. Heiss for petitioners in No; 298. William N. Geagan for petitioner in No. 311. Nathan Witt for International Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers et al., respondents in No. 298. David L. Holland for respondents in No. 311.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. . Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 268 F. 2d 54.