green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Mack v. Sturdivant
See, Maxton v. Johnson, 488 F.Supp. 1030, 1032, n. 2 (D.S.C.1980), citing United States v. White County Bridge Commission, 275 F.2d 529, 535 (7th Cir.) (a federal district court lacks the inherent power to hire or remove officials not within the executive control of that federal district court), cert. denied sub nomine, Clippinger v. United States, 364 U.S. 818 , 81 S.Ct. 50 , 5 L.Ed.2d 48 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lilley ex rel. Missouri Defense Bonds v. Missouri
See Byrd v. Sexton, 277 F.2d 418, 424 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 818 , 81 S.Ct. 49 , 5 L.Ed.2d 48 (1960); Braderman v. Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, 598 F.Supp. 834 , 840 n. 3 (M.D.Pa.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lilley v. State of Mo.
See Byrd v. Sexton, 277 F.2d 418, 424 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 818 , 81 S.Ct. 49 , 5 L.Ed.2d 48 (1960); Braderman v. Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, 598 F.Supp. 834 , 840 n. 3 (M.D.Pa.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kidwell v. Meikle
See Section IV(H), Infra 4 E. g., United States v. White County Bridge Commission, 275 F.2d 529, 535 (7th Cir.), Cert. denied, 364 U.S. 818 , 81 S.Ct. 50 , 5 L.Ed.2d 48 (1960) (federal statute authorizing direct action by United States to recover misappropriated funds does not authorize relator action by United States naming local agency as plaintiff); State ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
Emma Janousek v. Louis B. French, Special Administrator of the Estate of Willis W. French, Deceased, Emma Janousek v. John Manus
See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2283 , and annotations thereto at note 34, and Byrd v. Sexton, 8 Cir., 277 F.2d 418 , certiorari denied, 364 U.S. 818 , 5 L.Ed.2d 48 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James H. McLellan v. Mississippi Power & Light Company, International Brotherhood of Electricalworkers, Local 605 Electrical Workers
(2×)
See, e. g., Byrd v. Sexton, 277 F.2d 418, 426 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 818 , 81 S.Ct. 49 , 5 L.Ed.2d 48 (1960); Bomar v. Bogart, 159 F.2d 338 (2d Cir. 1947); Love v. Chandler, 124 F.2d 785, 786 (8th Cir. 1942); Koch v. Zuieback, 194 F.Supp. 651 (S.D.Cal. 1961), aff’d, 316 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1963); C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Deakyne v. Commissioners Of Lewes
See also Thermal Dynamics Corp. v. Union Carbide Corp., 42 F.R.D. 607 (D.N.H.1967). 17 "[T]he trial court's discretion to refuse a charge because untimely requested should be sparingly and cautiously exercised, * * *." Wilson v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Co., 275 F.2d 819, 822 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U. S. 817 , 81 S.Ct. 49 , 5 L.Ed.2d 48 (1960) 18 Cf. Chamberlin v. United Engineers and Constructors, Inc., 194 F.Supp. 647, 649 (E.D.Pa.1961); Schwartz v. American Stores Co., 22 F.R.D. 38 (E.D.Pa.1958); 1A Barron and Holtzoff, supra note 12 at § 442, p. 711. 19 Citing United States v.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Deakyne v. Commissioners of Lewes
See also Thermal Dynamics Corp. v. Union Carbide Corp., 42 F.R.D. 607 (D.N.H.1967). . “[T]he trial court’s discretion to refuse a charge because untimely requested should be sparingly and cautiously exercised, * * Wilson v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Co., 275 F.2d 819, 822 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U. S. 817 , 81 S.Ct. 49 , 5 L.Ed.2d 48 (1960). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Consolidated Title Corp.
v.
District of Columbia
v.
District of Columbia
No. 136.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1960.
John J. Wilson, Philip S. Peyser and Thomas S. Jackson for petitioner. Chester H. Gray, Milton D. Korman and Henry E. Wixon for respondent.
Published
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.