Cent. Ice Cream Co. v. Goldenrod Ice Cream Co., 368 U.S. 829 (1961).

Cent. Ice Cream Co. v. Goldenrod Ice Cream Co., 368 U.S. 829 (1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment published Issue: valid exculpatory clausePA ↗ 2.2 score

35 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 348 F.2d 674 (5th Cir. 1965)

Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of

1962 1994 2026

How cited ↗

Cited for

Other citing cases3 with no pin cite or quoted language on record

Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 348 F.2d 674 (5th Cir. 1965).published 2 cites
Indiana Grocery Co., Inc. v. Super Valu Stores, Inc., 647 F. Supp. 254 (S.D. Ind. 1986).published 2 cites
Roorda v. Am. Oil Co., 446 F. Supp. 939 (W.D.N.Y. 1978).published 2 cites

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 29

Cited "see, e.g." 4

Cited "see" 2

Treatment by court

Federal circuit treatment

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

Central Ice Cream Co.
v.
Goldenrod Ice Cream Co.

No. 201.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct 9, 1961.

Published opinion

368 U.S. 829

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

William C. Wines and Daniel J. Ryan for petitioner. Philip A. Rose and Claude A. Roth for respondent.

Published

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Your account