Imparato Stevedoring Corp. v. United States Lines Co., 374 U.S. 833 (1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Imparato Stevedoring Corp. v. United States Lines Co., 374 U.S. 833 (1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
64 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Henry (nj, 1993-07-19) · Strongest negative: State v. Saez (njsuperctappdiv, 1993-11-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" State v. Saez
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1993 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. State v. Smith, 37 N.J. 481 , 181 A. 2d 761 (1962), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 835 , 83 S.Ct. 1879 , 10 L.Ed. 2d 1055 (1963), in which the Court held that the police did not violate the Fourth Amendment when officers peered into an apartment through either a keyhole or a crack in the door while they were standing in a common hallway.
cited Cited "see" State v. Henry
N.J. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Smith, 37 N.J. 481, 494 , 181 A. 2d 761 (1962), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 835 , 83 S.Ct. 1879 , 10 L.Ed. 2d 1055 (1963).
discussed Cited "see" Shelby County Jail Inmates v. Richard W. Westlake, Individually and as Sheriff of Shelby County
7th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Caputo v. U.S. Lines Company, 311 F.2d 413, 416 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 833 , 83 S.Ct. 1871 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1055 (1963); see also Lincoln v. Board of Regents of University System, 697 F.2d 928, 934 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 826 , 104 S.Ct. 97 , 78 L.Ed.2d 102 (1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. De La Paz
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 2001 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Smith, 37 N.J. 481, 490, 495-97 , 181 A. 2d 761 (1962), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 835 , 83 S.Ct. 1879 , 10 L.Ed. 2d 1055 (1963) (peering from common hallway in three-flat apartment building through crack or keyhole of defendant's door not a search); State v. Gibson, 318 N.J.Super. 1, 9-10 , 722 A. 2d 960 (App.Div.1999) (peering from common thoroughfare into residential driveway not a search); State v. Stanton, 265 N.J.Super. 383, 384-87 , 627 A. 2d 674 (App. Div.1993) (peering from common hallway into motel room window when occupant pulled back drapes not a search).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Foley
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
"There is no legitimate expectation of privacy, ... shielding that portion of the interior of an automobile which may be viewed from outside the vehicle by either inquisitive passersby or diligent police officers." Texas v. Brown, supra, 460 U.S. at 740 , 103 S.Ct. at 1542 ; see also State v. Smith, 37 N.J. 481, 496-497 (1962), cert. den. 374 U.S. 835 , 83 S.Ct. 1879 , 10 L.Ed. 2d 1055 (1963).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Imparato Stevedoring Corp.
v.
United States Lines Co.
No. 1069.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1963.
374 U.S. 833
✓ 10 L. Ed. 2d 1055
Sidney A. Schwarts for petitioner. Joseph M. Cunningham and Vernon S. Jones for respondent. Martin J. McHugh and James M. Leonard for the National Association of Stevedores, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published

Motion of the National Association of Stevedores for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.