green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Crist
(2×)
See generally, State v. Williams, 23 Ohio St.3d 16, 20 , 490 N.E.2d 906, 911 (1986), citing State v. Cooper, 52 Ohio St.2d 163 , 370 N.E.2d 725 (1977), vacated on other grounds (1978), 438 U.S. 911 , 98 S.Ct. 3137 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1157 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Clemons
See State v. Williams (1977), 51 Ohio St.2d 112 , 5 O.O.3d 98 , 364 N.E.2d 1364 , paragraph one of the syllabus, vacated on other grounds (1978), 438 U.S. 911 , 98 S.Ct. 3137 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1156 ; State v. Awan (1986), 22 Ohio St.3d 120, 122 , 22 OBR 199, 201, 489 N.E.2d 277, 279 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Allen
See State v. Williams (1977), 51 Ohio St.2d 112 , 5 O.O.3d 98 , 364 N.E.2d 1364 , vacated on other grounds (1978), 438 U.S. 911 , 98 S.Ct. 3137 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1156 . {¶ 33} Furthermore, Allen’s claims regarding evidence of English’s character have no merit.
discussed
Cited "see"
Harvard v. State
(2×)
See, Jacobs v. Wainwright, ___ U.S. ___, 105 S.Ct. 545 , 83 L.Ed.2d 433 (1984) (facts from Marshal, J., dissenting), denying certiorari in Florida death case where trial court rejected nonstatutory mitigating evidence, and counsel failed to preserve issue on appeal. [14] Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 , 98 S.Ct. 2954 , 57 L.Ed.2d 973 (1978) (plurality opinion), held an Ohio statute unconstitutional because it limited the mitigating circumstances which may be considered by the sentencer. [15] Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 , 102 S.Ct. 869 , 71 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982), a 5-4 decision, held trial cour…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Wilson
(2×)
R. 12(B) and 12(G), alleged defects in an indictment must be asserted before trial or they are waived"); see, also, State v. Williams, 51 Ohio St. 2d 112, 117, 98, 101 , 364 N.E. 2d 1364 (1977), 1367-1368, death penalty vacated, 438 U.S. 911 , 98 S.Ct. 3137 , 57 L.Ed. 2d 1156 (1977). {¶111} In addition, in the case at bar, in response to two questions, the jury was instructed that Count One of the Indictment concerned touching the vagina of E.C. and Count Two of the Indictment concerned touching the buttocks of E.C. 10T., Jury trial June 10, 2016 at 1617-1625.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Baston
“In absence of any showing of bias, prejudice, or prodding of a witness to elicit partisan testimony, it will be presumed that the trial court acted with impartiality [in propounding to the witness questions from the bench] in attempting to ascertain a material fact or to develop the truth.” Jenkins v. Clark (1982), 7 Ohio App.3d 93, 98 , 7 OBR 124, 129, 454 N.E.2d 541, 548 ; see, also, State v. Wade (1978), 53 Ohio St.2d 182 , 7 O.O.3d 362 , 373 N.E.2d 1244 , paragraph two of the syllabus, vacated on other grounds (1978), 438 U.S. 911 , 98 S.Ct. 3138 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1157 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cooper
v.
Ohio
v.
Ohio
No. 908, Misc..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1963.
Petitioner pro se. John T. Corrigan for respondent.
Published
Supreme Court of Ohio. Certiorari denied.