Herring v. Dist. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate Dist., 382 U.S. 935 (1965). · Go Syfert
Search
Herring v. Dist. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate Dist., 382 U.S. 935 (1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Robert Candella (ca2, 1972-11-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Robert Candella (2×)
2d Cir. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Price, 345 F.2d 256 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 382 U.S. 949 , 86 S.Ct. 404 , 15 L.
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Williams (2×)
Pa. · 1972 · signal: accord · confidence high
That formulation of the test for sufficiency of the evidence is in accord with the prevailing test in the federal courts: “Whether reasonable minds could find that the evidence excludes every hypothesis but that of guilt.” Kaplan v. United States, 329 F. 2d 561, 563 (9th Cir. 1964); accord Barnard v. United States, 342 F. 2d 309 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 948 , 86 S. Ct. 403 (1966); Thomas v. United States, 369 F. 2d 372 (9th Cir. 1966).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Dennis Robert Freeman
9th Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Price, 345 F.2d 256 , 259 n. 3, (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 949 , 86 S.Ct. 404 , 15 L.Ed.2d 357 (1965).”
cited Cited "see" In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Weinstein
Or. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Barnard v. United States, 342 F2d 309 (9th Cir), cert. denied, 382 US 948 , 86 S Ct 403 , 15 L Ed 2d 356 (1965).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Perkins
D.D.C. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Price, 345 F.2d 256 , 259 n. 3, (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 949 , 86 S.Ct. 404 , 15 L.Ed.2d 357 (1965). 10 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Herring
v.
District Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District
No. 185.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 6, 1965.
382 U.S. 935
1965 U.S. LEXIS 133
Petitioner pro se., Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and George J. Roth, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
Cited by 40 opinions  |  Published

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.